If you obsessively follow Microsoft news – and surely you do, right? – you may have seen references to the “new Outlook for Windows.” That might have led you to the conclusion that Microsoft is working on, I don’t know, let’s guess something crazy, maybe, maybe . . . a new Outlook for Windows?
Don’t be worried about your dear, creaky, much-used-but-seldom-loved Outlook program. This is Microsoft Land, where words don’t mean what they seem. The branding team only has fourteen words or so to work with, so everything is named Outlook, and in any case your familiar desktop Outlook program will continue to exist until roughly the end of time.
Here’s what’s going on.
The current desktop version of Outlook for Windows will be maintained forever
The desktop version of Outlook for Windows needs to be updated. Like, it really needs to be updated. It’s got legacy code that hasn’t applied to anyone for decades. We’ve become skilled at overlooking its antique bits. That’s why bad guys use the “RSS Subscriptions” folder to divert mail when they hack your mailbox – our eyes literally can’t focus on it.
Outlook works well for Microsoft 365 business mail and Outlook.com mailboxes. As the years go by, it’s getting worse at handling any other mail. I put it this way last year:
“It’s not the best program for other kinds of mail. Oh, all the old architecture is still hanging off the back for POP3 and IMAP mailboxes, and you can still create PST files, which are just as unstable and difficult to work with as ever. If you’re still using a POP3 or IMAP mail service, (1) stop, just stop, go get a Gmail or Outlook.com address, and (2) don’t use Outlook. It’s not very good at those any more. And Gmail hates Outlook. They don’t get along at all. Don’t even try.”
But Microsoft is stuck. It has built its reputation with corporations by maintaining compatibility and legacy code forever. Somewhere are companies that built custom add-ins for Outlook back in 1997 and they’re in no mood to change their habits, and Microsoft can’t say no to those sweet, sweet long-term maintenance contracts with huge enterprises.
So the desktop version of Outlook that you use now – it will be maintained more or less forever. At some point Microsoft will stop promoting it in favor of something new, but it will still be there.
But the desktop Outlook program won’t get any better. If you find it clumsy or buggy today, it will probably still be clumsy and buggy tomorrow.
That’s an elaborate explanation of why nothing will change. So what’s this “new Outlook”?
Hang on, we’re not done with the background.
Microsoft uses the name “Outlook” for everything it creates that has anything to do with mail. “Outlook” is the name for Microsoft webmail. There are Outlook apps for iPhones and Android phones. Personal Microsoft email addresses are @outlook.com. “Outlook” is the code name for every single project developed by Microsoft worldwide. That last one might not be true, but it doesn’t seem impossible, does it?
Focus on webmail. Take a look at it – click here for your business mailbox, or click here for personal @outlook.com webmail.
Simple, streamlined, attractive, fast enough. (But not as fast as Gmail. What is Google’s secret magic that makes its services so fast?)
If you are accustomed to the desktop version of Outlook, you will discover that webmail has a frustrating limitation. I don’t know what it will be! It will be uniquely yours. But I bet there’s something that you think is missing or wrong or just frustratingly different than desktop Outlook. I used Outlook webmail exclusively for six months and it was fine, just fine, but I gave up and went back to cluttered familiar desktop Outlook because I missed Quick Steps. It will be something different for you, some muscle memory itch that you have to scratch.
But take a look at that webmail interface. We’re going to meet it again soon.
Ahem. “New Outlook,” you meandering twit?
Microsoft has been hinting at a completely rewritten version of Outlook for more than a year. “Project Monarch” was the code name for a unified mail client that will work identically everywhere – Windows, Mac, webmail.
After 18 months of development, late nights of hard work by armies of programmers, Microsoft released a preview of the new Outlook. And after all the meetings and whiteboards and deep thought . . .
The new Outlook looks a lot like Outlook webmail.
Like, nearly identical.
Technically it doesn’t run in a web browser. It opens up its own window. But you can install Outlook webmail to open in its own window, too. In fact the new Outlook seems to be not much more than a wrapper for webmail.
Aha! I hear you say. Webmail can only be used when you’re online! Surely the new Outlook . . . and then you’ll see my sad expression as I hold up my finger and make a Tch! sound and, well, in its current preview form, the new Outlook won’t work offline.
Actually the preview is far more crippled than it looks. It’s only available to preview testers in the Office beta channel, so Microsoft doesn’t pretend it’s finished like it did with Windows 11. (Oh, snap!)
But after eighteen months of development, this first look (1) doesn’t work offline, (2) only works with one mailbox, (3) only works with a Microsoft business mailbox, not @outlook.com, Gmail, or any other POP or IMAP mail service, (4) doesn’t support Quick Steps or Search Folders, and (5) doesn’t support business shared mailboxes.
In other words, it’s not just that it looks exactly like webmail. In its current state, it’s far weaker than webmail.
Which is just weird.
Be fair. Read Microsoft’s description of the features of the new Outlook. You might see something that looks swell. For me, it’s dragging and dropping messages to Calendar and To Do, except, hmm, I can do that today in webmail, so which features are actually new in the “new Outlook”? Hard to say.
Let me guess what’s going on. Under the hood Microsoft is building out an infrastructure to link all of its enterprise tools tightly together. The new Outlook is tied deeply into Microsoft Teams and Microsoft Loop, which is itself a vast enterprise system that theoretically will be used for everything collaborative, from project notes to polls to calendars. With luck, you will never see the word “Loop,” even if you use something built on it, but with Microsoft you never know.
The payoff for the new Outlook, then will be (1) for enterprises, and (2) not just for Outlook but for all the Microsoft services that wind up woven together in a big seamless array of intuitive, bug-free productivity apps, because that’s what we count on from Microsoft, right?
In the meantime, use webmail and tell yourself it’s a “new Outlook.” Might as well. It’s the same thing. Then go back to the desktop version of Outlook and try not to look at the obsolete folder named “Conversation History,” except now that I’ve mentioned it you won’t be able to unsee it.
are we going to lose the offline email client? Are they planning to move to an online version? What is the difference between the new outlook and the one we have through any browser?
It’s a moving target. As far as I know, we’re still waiting for an updated app with offline access. But various versions are in different testing channels and features will change constantly. Microsoft has not been good lately at communicating timelines and features – about all you can do is watch for reports and google around to see where things stand.
There is *still* no Junk entry on the popup context menu (right mouse click) when 2 or more junk/spam email items are selected, so I see no improvement in managing junk/spam mail.
Test. Every comment I’ve submitted disappeared.
Sorry! I moderate the comments and didn’t get to these timely while I’m off traveling. They’re appreciated, honest!
Actually, I seem to be the fool here. I hadn’t realized that there’s a URL difference between an “awaiting-moderation-containing-comment” and the clean URL. When you load/reload the “awaiting” URL, e.g.
https://www.bruceb.com/2022/05/meet-the-new-outlook-not-the-same-as-the-old-outlook/?unapproved=119232&moderation-hash…
you DO see the comment which is awaiting moderation. With the clean URL
https://www.bruceb.com/2022/05/meet-the-new-outlook-not-the-same-as-the-old-outlook/
you do not.
So I erroneously assumed every comment I entered was wiped. They were still there. And you actually got around to moderating very rapidly, under half a day, so don’t apologize!
I certainly appreciate A. Your accurate, on point, contextually supported webpages/answers to dilemmas; B. Your terrific followup to user comments, and real, contemplative responses. Forget that Google and MS and other tech giants flatly ignore user input (and in my honest believe, ignore UserVoice, but merely cite it after the fact as though it mattered), but even individual pages have a very mixed record of author interaction with comments. The great websites, and great performers, do a great job with that – including yourself; C. your candidness regarding design idiocy, when is honestly unforgiveable for the human atrocities repeatedly (I cannot overstress the word repeatedly) committed by MS interface morons.
If you don’t mind a diversion here, I’ll give a candid revelation, or my believed perception: I have worked forever in software and I know how things work with hotshots and their flashy new ideas; some hotshot builds a Powerpoint and says, “look at how much better this is” and everyone at the design meeting goes, “yeah, that IS better!” and 55% of a test group goes “yes, this IS better!”. So 55% get a subtle if not unnoticeable gain, 25% never encounter it, and 20% are devastated. Just to pick ONE devastation, commonly a mental memory keystroke sequence is wrecked, and always, no exception, the number of keystrokes is either the same or increased. There are countless other examples but this single one shows how they just do not understand how people use their product.
Anyway, you seem to have the attitude, understanding and perspective that they simply do not, so I thought you might have an intellectual appreciation for that perception. Well, you said you appreciate comments, so I launched off here!
For desktop OL365, in the past month the “MRU” of search broke (the 3 most recent search queries) (what you see before you start typing, after hitting F3). There are still 3 shown, but they are not the most recent. It’s as though they’re giving ‘tarded “Top Results”.
Incremental search still operates; e.g. if you type subj after typing F3, you see search term expressions beginning with subj, like “subject:dog” and “subject:dog from:bundy”, and those SEEM to be MRU (or LIFO it you understand that abbreviation).
By the way there is wildcard support in [desktop] Outlook search, but it is clearly (I am definitely certain) broken/inconsistent in some searches, as are keywords AND, OR, and, or in some searches, for what it’s worth. At least, after you hunt and peck for something that “works”, it does continue to “work”, so you can gain benefit. But you are definitely at risk for false negatives (result matches not shown). It imposes a nervous and less productive state of existence…
Followup to my own report: Correction, SOME of the time the F3 search for desktop Outlook DOES pick up a search expression for the “MRU”; sometimes it does not.
Obviously the world is forced to play a viciously time wasting hunt and peck game to find out what works correctly and what does not, but I seem to find that if a search expression begins with the open parentheses character that it is rejected from the URL. That hurts me badly, because I begin almost all searches with that, e.g.
((subject:bob) OR (subject:carol) AND (-subject:Undeliverable))
and the MRU does not keep that.
It worked before, but broke around the start of June, 2022.
However, if you begin a search expression with an alphabetic character, it seems to be recorded in the MRU.
This is why adults – that is, product manufacturers – should not do drugs, mmkay?